![]() Perhaps the same will be true about damaging AI-generated images, Decker suggested. In 2022, a Ticketmaster meltdown ahead of her Eras Tour concert sparked rage online, leading to several legislative efforts to crack down on consumer-unfriendly ticketing policies. Swift’s enormous contingent of loyal “Swifties” expressed their outrage on social media this week, bringing the issue to the forefront. ![]() “This is indicative of a larger kind of fracturing content moderation and platform governance because if all the stakeholders – the AI companies, social media companies, regulators and civil society – are not talking about the same things and on the same page about how to address these issues, this type of content is just going to continue to proliferate,” he added.ĭecker said, however, that Swift being targeted could bring more attention to the growing issues around AI-generated imagery. However, there is also a much wider world of unmoderated not-safe-for-work AI models in open source platforms, Decker said. The incident also coincides with the rise of AI-generation tools such as ChatGPT and Dall-E. Although some images were found on sites such as Instagram and Reddit, they were a widespread issue on X in particular. It’s unclear where the Taylor Swift-related images originated. Meta, too, made cuts to its teams that tackle disinformation and coordinated troll and harassment campaigns on its platforms, people with direct knowledge of the situation told CNN, raising concerns ahead of the pivotal 2024 elections in the US and around the world. (In the EU, X is currently being investigated over its content moderation practices). X, for example, has largely gutted its content moderation team and relies on automated systems and user reporting. “The social media companies don’t really have effective plans in place to necessarily monitor the content,” he said. ![]() “This is a prime example of the ways in which AI is being unleashed for a lot of nefarious reasons without enough guardrails in place to protect the public square,” Ben Decker, who runs Memetica, a digital investigations agency, told CNN.ĭecker said the exploitation of generative AI tools to create potentially harmful content targeting all types of public figures is increasing quickly and spreading faster than ever across social media. The incident comes as the United States heads into a presidential election year, and concerns are growing about how misleading AI-generated images and videos could be used to head up disinformation efforts and ultimately disrupt the vote. The company did not respond to CNN’s request for comment. Like most major social media platforms, X’s policies ban the sharing of “synthetic, manipulated, or out-of-context media that may deceive or confuse people and lead to harm.” Swift’s spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment. But nothing on the internet is truly gone forever, and they will undoubtedly continue to be shared on other, less regulated channels. ![]() The photos – which show the singer in sexually suggestive and explicit positions – were viewed tens of millions of times before being removed from social platforms. The fake images of Taylor Swift were predominantly circulating on social media site X, previously known as Twitter. The cosmetics company previously faced a boycott from angry consumers.Pornographic, AI-generated images of the world’s most famous star spread across social media this week, underscoring the damaging potential posed by mainstream artificial intelligence technology: its ability to create convincingly real and damaging images. Most recently, after more than a dozen allegations made on TikTok, Charles' primary beauty sponsor, Morphe, announced it would cut ties with him. The same 16-year-old provided Insider with screenshots that showed his age could be seen on his profile for TikTok, where he said they exchanged direct messages. One 16-year-old who accused Charles of sending him nude photos and soliciting nude photos from him told Insider Charles "lied" in his statement. In an April 1 video on his YouTube channel called "holding myself accountable," Charles addressed two sexting accusations he said were made by 16-year-olds, saying that the interactions with the boys "should have never happened." He also alleged the accusers lied about their ages. There have been anonymous underage-sexting accusations against Charles on TikTok, and men alleged Charles attempted to manipulate them into romantic and sexual reciprocation. More than 15 men and boys have accused Charles of sexual misconduct dating back to 2019. YouTube's action against Charles came in the wake of a major sexting scandal he's involved in. James Charles at the 2019 MTV Video Music Awards. Account icon An icon in the shape of a person's head and shoulders.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |